Lavish and heavily scripted campaigns for first-person shooters don’t come cheap, though according to Cliff Bleszinski, these single-player components can cost upwards of 75 percent of the allotted budget.
In an interview with PC Gamer, the former Epic Games designer spoke candidly about the nature of developing a campaign in the genre, which for many is viewed as a disposable appetizer for the multiplayer section.
“Campaigns cost the most money. They usually cost 75% of the budget, and you burn through the campaign in a weekend, and then you guys go to multiplayer.”
Later in the piece, the developer — who is currently spearheading free-to-play shooter LawBreakers — offered an assessment of shooter campaigns in the AAA space.
“A shooter campaign is very scripted, linear sequence. Everyone gets it: you’re either doing that – a two-day campaign – or an Assassin’s Creed, Skyrim or Fallout, where it’s this ridiculously large world that’s open-ended, that takes forever to make and costs a load of money. This is order for your average console gamer to avoid the trade-in mentality of the $60 disc-based game.”
Bleszinski’s comments inevitably sparked a debate via forums and NeoGAF, leading to the developer acknowledging the reaction via Twitter:
Apparently I’m trending on Facebook due to saying the obvious about SP campaigns and budgets. Uh ok.
— Cliff Bleszinski (@therealcliffyb) February 1, 2016
Do you believe single-player campaigns for FPS games are worth upwards of 75 percent of the budget?
The post Cliff Bleszinski: FPS Campaigns Cost Upwards of 75 Percent of Budget appeared first on PlayStation LifeStyle.
Content originally posted Here this is not owned by The Video Games



GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings